Headband
Marketed as hybrid. That label describes how it is sold, not its chemistry — the research is clear that it does not predict much.
Across 493 laboratory results, Headband tested between 14.8% and 22.1% THC, with a median of 18.2%. Most sites print a single number here. The spread is the more useful fact.
Read this before the numbers
HIGHEST-RISK SLUG IN THE SET. Pools at least three distinct lineages: the NorCal 707 cut, DNA Genetics' separate recreation, and Breeders Lab versions. The lab rows almost certainly mix cultivars, so the published range spans more than one plant.
Laboratory chemistry
Every figure is a median across real lab results, with the middle 80% of those results beside it. A wide range means the same name tested very differently batch to batch.
| Cannabinoid | Median | Middle 80% | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| THC | 18.2% | 14.8% to 22.1% | 493 2 sources / about typical |
| CBD | 0.06% | 0.03% to 0.28% | 131 2 sources / about typical |
| CBG | 0.44% | 0.23% to 0.99% | 465 2 sources / below typical |
| CBN | 0.00% | 0.00% to 0.05% | 159 2 sources / about typical |
| CBC | 0.06% | 0.00% to 0.10% | 287 2 sources / above typical |
| THCV | 0.00% | 0.00% to 0.16% | 85 2 sources / about typical |
| Terpene | Median | Middle 80% | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myrcene | 0.32% | 0.09% to 0.88% | 116 2 sources / about typical |
| Limonene | 0.30% | 0.05% to 0.63% | 114 2 sources / above typical |
| Caryophyllene | 0.31% | 0.12% to 0.79% | 116 2 sources / about typical |
| Terpinolene | 0.01% | 0.00% to 0.51% | 116 2 sources / about typical |
| Pinene | 0.12% | 0.05% to 0.26% | 116 2 sources / about typical |
| Linalool | 0.09% | 0.03% to 0.19% | 116 2 sources / about typical |
| Humulene | 0.12% | 0.04% to 0.28% | 114 2 sources / above typical |
| Ocimene | 0.00% | 0.00% to 0.31% | 114 / about typical |
| Bisabolol | 0.03% | 0.00% to 0.10% | 111 2 sources / about typical |
| Nerolidol | 0.02% | 0.00% to 0.33% | 114 / about typical |
Reported genetics
disputed
At least five competing parentages are claimed, and Headband functions as a name applied to several clone cuts rather than one traceable cross.
Source: vireohealth.com
What this page does not tell you
- Whether the jar in your hand matches these numbers. Strain names are not standardised, certified or regulated. Research has found samples sharing a name that were as chemically distant from each other as samples with different names.
- How it will make you feel. This site holds no effect data, because no source publishes per-strain effect rates under a licence that permits reuse. An empty column is better than a borrowed guess.
- Anything medical. These are measurements, not claims about what cannabis does to a condition.
Sources
Where two sources cover the same analyte, the figure above is pooled over their combined samples rather than averaged — a median of two medians is not a median. Each source's own sample count is shown in the table.
- Smith, Vergara, Keegan & Kane (2022), The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States, PLOS ONE · lab · CC0-1.0
- Nevada Cannabis Compliance Board, Lab Library · lab · Public record, no stated restriction
Tried this one?
No one has reported on this strain yet. Yours would be the first. Effect data on this site comes entirely from people who used it, because no source of per-strain effect rates can be licensed at any price. Percentages appear once a strain has enough reports to be worth one.